Skip to content
Mappings
ISO 27001ASD ISM

ISO 27001 to ASD ISM

Every ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A control, with the ASD ISM controls that cover the same ground. Useful when you hold ISO 27001 and are asked to show ISM alignment, or the other way round.

ISO 27001 controls mapped (99%)
92 of 93
Control-to-control relationships
2,068
Distinct ASD ISM controls reached
1,071 of 1,143

92 of the 93 ISO 27001 controls (99%) have at least one ASD ISM counterpart, giving 2,068 control-to-control relationships across 1,071 distinct ASD ISM controls. ISO 27001 and the ISM overlap heavily in subject matter, so coverage here is high. What differs is depth: the ISM states specific technical requirements where Annex A states outcomes.

These relationships are generated from the Control Stack catalogue and reviewed for topic fidelity, then labelled with how the two controls relate rather than asserted as equivalent. Where no counterpart exists, the row says so plainly instead of stretching for a match. Some rows are read from the other framework’s own mappings, so the wording of those summaries leads with that side.

Control Stack is a free Australian reference covering 1,484 cyber security controls: all 1,143 ASD ISM controls, 152 Essential Eight controls across three maturity levels, all 93 ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A controls, 58 ASD Essentials for enterprise IT actions and all 38 ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Annex A controls. Every one of them is cross-mapped between the five frameworks and readable in full without an account.

Reviewed 16 September 2026 · Maps ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A to the September 2026 ASD ISM

Control by control

What the labels mean

One card per ISO 27001 control, grouped by theme, with every ASD ISM control mapped to it, strongest relationship first.

Showing all 93 ISO 27001 controls

Organisational controls

37 controls, 36 mapped

A.5.121 ASD ISM controls

Policies for information security

A.5.37 ASD ISM controls

Segregation of duties

A.5.1320 ASD ISM controls

Labelling of information

A.5.1623 ASD ISM controls

Identity life cycle management

A.5.3013 ASD ISM controls

ICT readiness for business continuity

People controls

8 controls, 8 mapped

A.6.713 ASD ISM controls

Remote working security measures

Physical controls

14 controls, 14 mapped

A.7.112 ASD ISM controls

Physical security perimeters

A.7.818 ASD ISM controls

Equipment siting and protection

A.7.1064 ASD ISM controls

Secure management of storage media

A.7.1233 ASD ISM controls

Secure cabling for power and data

A.7.138 ASD ISM controls

Proper maintenance of equipment

Technological controls

34 controls, 34 mapped

A.8.140 ASD ISM controls

Protection of user endpoint devices

A.8.725 ASD ISM controls

Protection against malware

A.8.1230 ASD ISM controls

Data leakage prevention measures

A.8.1557 ASD ISM controls

Logging of activities and events

A.8.186 ASD ISM controls

Use of privileged utility programs

A.8.20101 ASD ISM controls

Network and network devices security

A.8.2115 ASD ISM controls

Security of network services

A.8.2246 ASD ISM controls

Network segregation for security

A.8.2547 ASD ISM controls

Secure development lifecycle

How to use this mapping

Read it in whichever direction you are being assessed. If ISO 27001 is your primary framework, use the cards to find the ASD ISM controls that cover the same ground, so evidence you already hold can be reused instead of rebuilt. If ASD ISM is what you are being held to, search for a ASD ISM ID to see which ISO 27001 controls contribute. A mapping means the two controls address related risk, not that satisfying one satisfies the other, so always read the relationship label before relying on it.

What the relationship labels mean

Read each row as the ISO 27001 control, then the label, then the ASD ISM control.

Equivalent
Both controls ask for the same thing. Rare, and kept for genuinely matching requirements. 15 pairings on this page
Broader than
The source control covers everything the mapped control asks for, and more. 1,257 pairings on this page
Partially meets
The source control covers part of what the mapped control asks for. 56 pairings on this page
Partially overlaps
The two share ground, but neither contains the other. 475 pairings on this page
Supports
The source control helps achieve the mapped control. 128 pairings on this page
Depends on
The source control relies on the mapped control being in place. 137 pairings on this page

Frequently asked questions

Does meeting ISO 27001 mean I meet the ASD ISM?

No. The mapping shows where the two frameworks address related risk, not that one satisfies the other. ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A controls are broad outcome statements, while ISM controls are specific and often technical, so a single Annex A control typically corresponds to many ISM controls and rarely covers all of them. Use the mapping to reuse evidence, then check each ISM control on its own terms.

Why does one ISO 27001 control map to so many ISM controls?

Because the two are written at different levels of detail. An Annex A control such as access control states an outcome in a sentence or two. The ISM breaks the same ground into many separate, testable requirements covering privileged access, authentication, session handling and logging. A one-to-many relationship is the normal shape of this mapping rather than a sign of duplication.

What do the relationship labels mean?

Each pairing carries a label describing how the two controls relate. Partially meets means the mapped control covers part of the requirement. Partially overlaps means they share ground without either containing the other. Supports means one helps achieve the other. Depends on means one relies on the other being in place. Equivalent is reserved for genuinely matching requirements and is rare.

Is this mapping official?

No. Neither ISO nor the Australian Signals Directorate publishes an official crosswalk between these two frameworks. This mapping is produced by Control Stack from the control text of both frameworks and reviewed for topic fidelity. Treat it as a working aid for planning and evidence reuse, not as an authoritative statement from either body.