ASD ISM 1173 Multi-factor authentication for privileged human users of systems
What it says
Multi-factor authentication is used to authenticate privileged human users of systems.
Quoted as published. Everything else on this page is written by Control Stack.
What it means
In plain EnglishEvery person who holds privileged access to a system must prove who they are with more than a password before that access is granted.
Privileged users are the people who can change how a system works: administrators, engineers with root or domain-level rights, database owners, cloud console owners and anyone else whose account can alter configuration, security settings or other people's access. This control requires that when such a person logs in to a system, they are authenticated with multi-factor authentication (MFA), meaning at least two different types of proof, such as something they know (a password or PIN), something they have (a hardware security key, smart card or authenticator app) or something they are (a biometric). Why it matters: privileged accounts are the most valuable target an attacker can take. A stolen or guessed administrator password gives an intruder the same reach as your most trusted staff. Phishing, credential-stuffing from earlier breaches, malware that logs keystrokes and simple password reuse all defeat a password on its own. MFA breaks that chain, because the attacker also needs the second factor, which is far harder to obtain remotely. The control applies to human users specifically, so the focus is on interactive logins by people, not on service or machine accounts, and it applies to privileged access to systems generally, not just to one platform.
Free. Save your status, tasks and notes.
Why it matters
If privileged human users can authenticate with a password alone, a single phished, reused or leaked credential hands an attacker full administrative control. From there they can disable logging, create backdoor accounts, exfiltrate data, deploy ransomware across the environment or alter security settings, and the compromise is likely to go undetected for longer because the activity looks like legitimate administration. The organisation would also fail to meet the ISM's requirement for privileged authentication and be unable to demonstrate a basic safeguard expected by auditors, insurers and customers.
How to implement
Identity and access owner: build and maintain an inventory of every system and every account or role that carries privileged rights, by exporting admin group memberships from directories, cloud tenants, network devices, databases and SaaS admin portals, so the scope of enforcement is known.
Platform administrators: turn on MFA enforcement (not just availability) for privileged accounts in each system's native controls, for example conditional access policies for directory admins, MFA on cloud console root and IAM admin roles, and MFA-backed authentication on network device management interfaces.
Security architects: route privileged access to systems that cannot enforce MFA natively through a jump host, bastion or privileged access management tool that performs MFA before brokering the session, so every privileged human login passes through a factor check.
Security team: choose and issue phishing-resistant or at least app-based second factors (hardware security keys, smart cards, platform authenticators or authenticator apps) to all privileged users, and disable weaker options such as SMS codes for these accounts where the platform allows it.
Service desk and IAM team: document and run a secure enrolment and recovery process so that new privileged users are issued a second factor before their rights are activated, lost tokens are replaced only after identity verification, and no temporary bypass leaves an account on password-only access.
Keep it running
Day to day, this control lives in the identity and access management function. Someone needs to own the definition of which accounts and roles count as privileged, keep that list current as systems are added or roles change, and make sure each of those systems (directories, servers, network devices, cloud consoles, hypervisors, databases, SaaS admin portals, backup tools) enforces MFA for privileged logins rather than merely offering it. Joiner, mover and leaver processes should provision and revoke second factors alongside the privileged account itself. Helpdesk staff will handle lost or broken tokens, so a secure re-enrolment process is needed that does not quietly fall back to password-only access. Expect periodic exceptions to be requested for legacy systems that cannot natively enforce MFA; these should be handled by fronting the system with a jump host, privileged access management (PAM) tool or gateway that does enforce it, or by documenting a risk-accepted exception with a remediation date. Monitoring should flag any privileged login that occurred without MFA, since that usually signals a misconfiguration or an unmanaged system.
Evidence and audit
- Check 1 of 5What an auditor asks for
Ask for
Ask for the current inventory of privileged accounts and roles across all in-scope systems, together with a statement of who owns and maintains it.
Look at
Check that the inventory covers directories, servers, cloud consoles, network devices, databases and SaaS admin portals, and that it has been updated recently.
Good evidence
A complete, dated inventory exists, is owned by a named person or team, and matches what the systems themselves report when spot-checked.
- Check 2 of 5What an auditor asks for
Ask for
Ask for the MFA enforcement configuration for privileged accounts on a sample of systems, such as conditional access policies, cloud IAM settings or PAM policies.
Look at
Confirm the policy is set to require MFA for privileged logins with no exclusions or bypass groups, rather than simply making MFA optional.
Good evidence
Each sampled system shows an enforced rule that applies to all privileged human accounts, and any exclusion group is empty or justified in writing.
- Check 3 of 5What an auditor asks for
Ask for
Ask for authentication logs for privileged users over a recent period.
Look at
Look for privileged sign-ins and check whether each one records a completed second-factor step.
Good evidence
Every privileged login in the sample shows MFA was satisfied, and any password-only entries have been investigated and explained.
- Check 4 of 5What an auditor asks for
Ask for
Ask how privileged access is handled for systems that cannot enforce MFA natively, such as legacy appliances or older applications.
Look at
Review the jump host, bastion or PAM configuration that fronts those systems, or the documented risk acceptance if one exists.
Good evidence
Legacy systems are reachable for administration only through an MFA-protected path, or a formally approved exception with a remediation date is on file.
- Check 5 of 5What an auditor asks for
Ask for
Ask for the enrolment and token recovery procedure for privileged users and evidence of it being followed.
Look at
Check that a second factor is issued before privileged rights are activated and that recovery requires identity verification without leaving the account password-only.
Good evidence
Recent onboarding and recovery tickets show factors issued or replaced through the documented process, with no standing bypass.
Mappings
Closest match in ASD Essential Eight: E8-MF-ML2.1, Multi-factor authentication for privileged users of systems, which asks for the same thing.
ISO/IEC 27001: 1 mapping
This control partially meets A.8.5.
ISM-1173 requires MFA specifically for privileged users of systems. ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A 8.5 requires secure authentication technologies and procedures to be implemented based on access restrictions, which can include MFA and covers all users and authentication scenarios. ISM-1173 is therefore a specific implementation subset of the broader authentication control in Annex A 8.5.
ASD Essential Eight: 5 mappings
This control is equivalent to E8-MF-ML2.1.
ISM-1173 requires multi-factor authentication (MFA) for privileged human users of systems. E8-MF-ML2.1 states that MFA is used to authenticate privileged users of systems, matching the same core requirement and scope. Both controls focus on enforcing MFA specifically for privileged accounts rather than general user populations.
This control partially meets E8-MF-ML2.5.
ISM-1173 mandates MFA for privileged human users of systems. E8-MF-ML2.5 requires phishing-resistant MFA for all users of systems, which incorporates privileged users. It is more prescriptive about phishing resistance, which ISM-1173 does not specify.
This control partially overlaps E8-MF-ML2.3.
ISM-1173 mandates MFA for privileged human users of systems. E8-MF-ML2.3 requires phishing-resistant MFA for users of online services, potentially including privileged access paths when administration is online. The broader scope includes unprivileged users, while ISM-1173 is specific to privileged users of systems.
- E8-MF-ML3.1Multi-factor authentication is used to authenticate users of data repositoriesPartially overlaps
This control partially overlaps E8-MF-ML3.1.
E8-MF-ML3.1 requires MFA for users of data repositories. ISM-1173 requires MFA for privileged users of systems, which commonly includes administrators of repository systems and storage services. The overlap is MFA for repository-related access by privileged accounts, but ISM-1173 is broader (all privileged system access) and E8-MF-ML3.1 covers all repository users, not just privileged ones.
This control supports E8-MF-ML1.7.
ISM-1173 requires MFA for privileged human users to access systems. E8-MF-ML1.7 defines MFA by requiring two factors, supporting the implementation of MFA as dictated by ISM-1173. E8-MF-ML1.7 defines MFA but does not itself set the privileged scope.
Mappings show how controls relate across frameworks. They do not imply full equivalence or certification.




