Skip to content
Security assurance
ASD ISMISM-1984

ASD ISM 1984 Encrypt event logs in transit using ASD cryptography

What it says

Event logs sent to a centralised event logging facility are encrypted in transit using Australian Signals Directorate (ASD)-approved cryptography.

Quoted as published. Everything else on this page is written by Control Stack.

What it means

In plain English

Event logs must be encrypted with approved methods before being sent to a central logging system.

This control means making sure that as your organisation's event logs travel from various sources to a central system, they are encrypted using methods approved by the Australian Signals Directorate (ASD). This matters because if logs aren't encrypted, sensitive data could be intercepted and misused by cybercriminals.

Why it matters

If logs aren't encrypted in transit, sensitive information could be intercepted, leading to data breaches and reputational damage.

How to implement

  1. IT team should ensure all event logs sent over the internet are encrypted.

    They can do this by setting up secure connections using ASD-approved encryption methods like Transport Layer Security (TLS).

  2. System administrators should regularly review and update the encryption protocols.

    Check manuals and online resources from ASD for the latest guidelines on encryption standards.

  3. Managers should schedule training sessions for staff on the importance of encrypting event logs.

    Use simple training materials that explain what event logs are and why protecting them in transit is critical.

  4. Procurement should verify that any new logging systems or tools support ASD-approved encryption.

    Request confirmation from vendors that their products meet these standards before purchase.

  5. The compliance officer should document the encryption process in a security policy.

    This should include the encryption methods used, who is responsible for implementation, and how often it's reviewed.

Keep it running

Ensure encryption protocols are current and consistent across all systems. Regularly review ASD guidelines for any updates.

Evidence and audit

  1. Check 1 of 4What an auditor asks for

    Ask for

    the network security policy: Request the document that outlines how event log data is protected during transmission.

    Look at

    the encryption configuration settings: Verify that ASD-approved protocols like TLS are enabled.

    Good evidence

    A documented policy showing encryption standards, settings for TLS in network configurations, and personnel responsible for compliance.

  2. Check 2 of 4What an auditor asks for

    Ask for

    the list of log sources and destinations: This should show where logs originate and where they are sent within the organisation.

    Look at

    the log transport pathway documentation: Check it details encrypted pathways and methods in use.

    Good evidence

    Documentation showing log sources/destinations, encryption methods, and periodic reviews by the IT team.

  3. Check 3 of 4What an auditor asks for

    Ask for

    a training schedule: Ensure there are regular sessions on encryption practices.

    Look at

    the training materials and attendance records: Confirm they cover ASD-approved encryption methods.

    Good evidence

    Current training materials and participant lists showing regular training sessions.

  4. Check 4 of 4What an auditor asks for

    Ask for

    about the vendor selection process for logging tools: Inquire if ASD-approved encryption was a requirement.

    Look at

    purchase documents for new logging tools: These should specify encryption standards were a criteria.

    Good evidence

    Documentation of vendor assessments showing compliance with encryption standards at the time of purchase.

Mappings

Closest match in ISO/IEC 27001: A.8.15, Logging of activities and events, which this control partially meets.

ISO 27001

ISO/IEC 27001: 2 mappings

ASD Essentials

ASD Essentials for enterprise IT: 1 mapping

Mappings show how controls relate across frameworks. They do not imply full equivalence or certification.