Skip to content
System access
ASD ISMISM-1558

ASD ISM 1558 Ensure secure construction of passwords

What it says

Passwords using a sequence of words for single-factor authentication are not constructed using: - a list of categorised words - a real sentence in a natural language - song lyrics, movie or television show quotes, literature, or any other publicly available material - less than 4 random words for non-classified, OFFICIAL: Sensitive and PROTECTED systems; 5 random words for SECRET systems; or 6 random words for TOP SECRET systems.

Quoted as published. Everything else on this page is written by Control Stack.

What it means

In plain English

Passwords must not use predictable sequences, like quotes or sentences, and must meet minimum word count rules for security levels.

This control is about creating strong passwords by avoiding predictable patterns. Think of how easy it would be for someone to guess a password if you used movie quotes or a famous song lyric. If your password is too predictable, someone could gain access and cause harm, such as stealing sensitive information or causing operational disruptions.

Why it matters

Weak passphrases (e.g., quotes, predictable word lists or too few words) are easier to guess, enabling unauthorised access and data compromise.

How to implement

  1. IT managers should develop a password policy that specifies the use of random words rather than predictable sequences.

    Use examples to illustrate combinations of random words and explain why they are more secure.

  2. Office managers should train staff on how to choose passwords that follow these guidelines.

    Conduct workshops or information sessions demonstrating the creation of passwords using four or more random words.

  3. HR should include password creation techniques in new employee onboarding materials.

    Provide a checklist or guide that outlines the rules for crafting secure passwords.

  4. System owners should review current password practices and update password requirements to meet the new standards.

    Ensure all systems enforce these rules through technical settings.

  5. IT staff should implement tools that check password submissions against a list of disallowed patterns, such as famous quotes or song lyrics.

    Automate rejection of passwords that do not meet the complexity criteria.

Keep it running

Use 4-6 truly random words per classification; avoid quotes, lyrics, real sentences, categorised word lists, and predictable word order.

Evidence and audit

  1. Check 1 of 5What an auditor asks for

    Ask for

    The organisation's password policy document.

    Look at

    Sections detailing the prohibition of common phrases and patterns.

    Good evidence

    Includes clear guidelines on constructing passwords using random words and avoiding predictable sequences.

  2. Check 2 of 5What an auditor asks for

    Ask for

    Evidence of staff training sessions on password security.

    Look at

    Attendance records and training materials.

    Good evidence

    Shows regular training sessions and materials that emphasise avoiding predictable patterns in passwords.

  3. Check 3 of 5What an auditor asks for

    Look at

    Instances of rejected passwords based on automated checks.

    Good evidence

    Would be seeing systems in place that flag and prevent the use of simplistic passwords.

  4. Check 4 of 5What an auditor asks for

    Ask for

    A list of password management tools in use.

    Look at

    Their capability to enforce password policies.

    Good evidence

    Includes tools that automatically enforce the minimum word count and randomness requirements.

  5. Check 5 of 5What an auditor asks for

    Look at

    Guides or instructions given to new employees.

    Good evidence

    Shows clear instructions that align with this control to prevent the use of predictable sequences in passwords.

Mappings

Closest match in ISO/IEC 27001: A.5.17, Management of authentication information, which this control partially meets.

ISO 27001

ISO/IEC 27001: 2 mappings

Mappings show how controls relate across frameworks. They do not imply full equivalence or certification.