Skip to content
System hardening
ASD ISMISM-1392

ASD ISM 1392 Restrict file modifications via path rules

What it says

When implementing application control using path rules, only approved users can modify approved files and write to approved folders.

Quoted as published. Everything else on this page is written by Control Stack.

What it means

In plain English

Only certain users can change files and folders as allowed by system rules.

This control is about making sure that only the right people can change important files and folders on your computer system. It matters because if everyone could make changes, it could lead to accidental or malicious damage, like removing critical files or installing harmful programs that could disrupt your business.

Why it matters

If path rules allow unauthorised changes to approved files or folders, attackers can tamper with trusted apps, causing compromise or outages.

How to implement

  1. IT team should define which files and folders are critical or sensitive.

    They can do this by listing all essential files and directories that impact business operations or hold sensitive information.

  2. The manager should decide which staff require permission to modify these critical files.

    This involves assessing job roles and responsibilities to determine who truly needs access.

  3. The system administrator should set up path rules on the operating system to enforce these permissions.

    They can do this by configuring the system settings so that only approved users can make changes to specified files and folders.

  4. The HR team should ensure that permission settings are regularly reviewed and updated, especially when staff roles change.

    This means checking who currently has access to sensitive files and modifying permissions as needed during role changes or staff turnover.

  5. The IT team should provide training to staff on why these rules and restrictions are in place.

    This can be done through regular information sessions explaining the importance of protecting digital assets and preventing unauthorised access.

Keep it running

Review and test path rules regularly so only approved users can write to approved folders and modify approved files; monitor and audit rule changes.

Evidence and audit

  1. Check 1 of 5What an auditor asks for

    Ask for

    A list of approved files and folders with restricted access.

    Look at

    The details to confirm the list is complete and up-to-date.

    Good evidence

    Includes a dated document with file paths and the names of those with access permissions.

  2. Check 2 of 5What an auditor asks for

    Ask for

    The access permissions report from the system.

    Look at

    The configurations to see if path rules are correctly implemented.

    Good evidence

    Shows clear rules set for specific files and users as intended.

  3. Check 3 of 5What an auditor asks for

    Ask for

    To see the HR process for updating user access permissions.

    Look at

    When and how permissions are reviewed.

    Good evidence

    Includes documented procedures and logs showing regular updates and checks.

  4. Check 4 of 5What an auditor asks for

    Ask for

    Records of training sessions on file access restrictions.

    Look at

    Attendance records and materials covered.

    Good evidence

    Includes a schedule of training sessions and outlined topics discussed with evidence of participant attendance.

  5. Check 5 of 5What an auditor asks for

    Ask for

    A log of access attempts to sensitive files.

    Look at

    The log to ensure failed attempts are effectively monitored.

    Good evidence

    Shows proactive monitoring with irregular activities flagged for review and action.

Mappings

Closest match in ISO/IEC 27001: A.5.15, Access control policies and procedures, which this control partially meets.

ISO 27001

ISO/IEC 27001: 4 mappings

Essential Eight

ASD Essential Eight: 6 mappings

ASD Essentials

ASD Essentials for enterprise IT: 1 mapping

Mappings show how controls relate across frameworks. They do not imply full equivalence or certification.