ASD ISM 0475 Use P-384 curve for secure digital signatures
What it says
When using ECDSA for digital signatures, a base point order and key size of at least 224 bits is used, preferably the P-384 curve.
Quoted as published. Everything else on this page is written by Control Stack.
What it means
In plain EnglishEnsure stronger digital signature security by using ECDSA with a key size of at least 224 bits, ideally the P-384 curve.
This control is about using a specific method for signing digital documents to ensure they are authentic and haven't been altered. It's important because if digital signatures aren't strong, someone could fake documents, leading to security breaches and potential fraud.
Free. Save your status, tasks and notes.
Why it matters
Using ECDSA with too-small keys or weaker curves can enable signature forgery, undermining integrity and trust in signed data and documents.
How to implement
IT managers should ensure that their systems use the P-384 curve for digital signatures.
Do this by reviewing the system settings or consulting with a trusted IT provider to confirm that this curve is used and correctly configured.
System administrators should regularly update their cryptographic libraries to ensure they support the P-384 curve.
This can involve downloading the latest updates from your software provider or checking with the vendor for upgrade instructions.
IT security consultants should conduct an annual audit of the company's digital signature processes to verify the use of the P-384 curve.
This involves examining software settings and configurations in use across all systems.
Training coordinators should conduct training for relevant staff on why using secure digital signatures is crucial.
Create materials explaining the risks of not using the P-384 curve, and demonstrate how to check if systems are compliant.
Keep it running
Regularly verify that ECDSA uses at least a 224-bit key, aiming for P-384, to maintain signature strength and stay compliant.
Evidence and audit
- Check 1 of 5What an auditor asks for
Ask for
System configuration files that specify digital signature algorithms.
Look at
The details indicating the use of the P-384 curve.
Good evidence
Will show settings explicitly mentioning the P-384 curve being applied.
- Check 2 of 5What an auditor asks for
Look at
The technical specifications to confirm P-384 curve support.
Good evidence
Includes documentation from the vendor detailing compliance with the P-384 curve requirement.
- Check 3 of 5What an auditor asks for
Ask for
To see records of security audits conducted on digital signature processes.
Look at
The auditor's findings and recommendations.
Good evidence
Will include an audit report stating that the P-384 curve is in use and adequately implemented.
- Check 4 of 5What an auditor asks for
Look at
Entries that describe upgrades or fixes to digital signature tools.
Good evidence
Will have records showing regular updates supporting P-384 curve compliance.
- Check 5 of 5What an auditor asks for
Ask for
Training records for staff involved in the digital signature process.
Look at
Details on training sessions that covered signature security and P-384 use.
Good evidence
Is a training schedule or completion certificates for staff showing they understand the importance of using the P-384 curve.
Mappings
Closest match in ISO/IEC 27001: A.8.24, Effective use of cryptography and key management, which this control partially meets.
ISO/IEC 27001: 1 mapping
This control partially meets A.8.24.
ISM-0475 requires organisations to use sufficiently strong ECDSA parameters for digital signatures (at least 224-bit order/key size, preferably P-384). This relates directly to Annex A 8.24, which requires rules for the effective use of cryptography and cryptographic key management across the organisation. ISM-0475 is a specific cryptographic standard for one use case (ECDSA signatures), whereas Annex A 8.24 is broader and covers cryptography policy, algorithm selection, key lifecycle management and governance.
Mappings show how controls relate across frameworks. They do not imply full equivalence or certification.




