Skip to content
System hardening
ASD ISMISM-1409

ASD ISM 1409 Implement restrictive OS hardening guidelines

What it says

Operating systems are hardened using ASD and vendor hardening guidance, with the most restrictive guidance taking precedence when conflicts occur.

Quoted as published. Everything else on this page is written by Control Stack.

What it means

In plain English

Ensure operating systems follow strictest security guidelines from ASD or vendors.

This control is about making sure your computer systems are set up with the most secure settings available. It's important because if you don't use the strictest security settings, you leave the door open for hackers to get into your systems and cause harm, like stealing sensitive information or disrupting your business operations.

Why it matters

Without restrictive OS hardening baselines, insecure services and settings may be enabled, increasing attack surface and enabling unauthorised access.

How to implement

  1. The IT team should review security guidelines from the Australian Signals Directorate (ASD) and the system's manufacturer to ensure your operating systems have the strongest possible security settings.

    This involves checking for any updates to guidelines and applying them promptly.

  2. System administrators should establish a routine to compare security settings between the ASD guidelines and the vendor's recommendations.

    Where they differ, use the more restrictive setting to minimise security risks.

  3. Managers should ensure the IT team has the resources and time to implement these strict security settings.

    This might include buying software tools or allocating time for staff training.

  4. IT teams should deploy automated tools to monitor compliance with these security settings continuously.

    These tools can alert IT staff to any deviations from established security protocols.

  5. System owners should document all security settings applied and any justifications for their choices, especially when deviating from recommended guidelines, ensuring clarity and accountability in security practices.

Keep it running

Regularly compare OS builds to ASD and vendor hardening baselines; when guidance conflicts, apply the most restrictive setting and document any exceptions.

Evidence and audit

  1. Check 1 of 5What an auditor asks for

    Ask for

    The documentation showing the comparison between ASD and vendor security guidelines: Ensure the comparison regularly occurs.

    Look at

    How often this review happens and check the last review date.

    Good evidence

    Shows a consistent review process with clear justification for decisions made and the most restrictive settings applied.

  2. Check 2 of 5What an auditor asks for

    Good evidence

    Is a report showing all recommended settings are in place without exceptions.

  3. Check 3 of 5What an auditor asks for

    Ask for

    Logs or reports from automated compliance monitoring tools: Review if they show ongoing compliance and alert handling.

    Good evidence

    Is a log showing no or promptly resolved alerts.

  4. Check 4 of 5What an auditor asks for

    Good evidence

    Includes recent training sessions focusing on the security guidelines used.

  5. Check 5 of 5What an auditor asks for

    Good evidence

    Explains deviations with a strong justification supported by risk assessments.

Mappings

Closest match in ASD Essential Eight: E8-AH-ML3.1, .NET Framework 3.5, 3.0, 2.0 is disabled or removed, which this control covers in full and more.

ISO 27001

ISO/IEC 27001: 2 mappings

Essential Eight

ASD Essential Eight: 4 mappings

ASD Essentials

ASD Essentials for enterprise IT: 4 mappings

Mappings show how controls relate across frameworks. They do not imply full equivalence or certification.