Skip to content
Email
ASD ISMISM-1024

ASD ISM 1024 Verify senders for email failure notifications

What it says

Notifications of undeliverable emails are only sent to senders that can be verified via SPF or other trusted means.

Quoted as published. Everything else on this page is written by Control Stack.

What it means

In plain English

Only verified senders get notified if their email cannot be delivered.

This control means that when you send an email and it can't be delivered, you'll only get a notification if your identity as the sender can be verified. This is important because it helps to combat email scams and ensures that only genuine users are notified about email issues, preventing harmful activities like spammers from getting useful information about email addresses that work.

Why it matters

If undeliverable mail notifications go to unverified senders, attackers can confirm valid addresses and refine spam/phishing campaigns, increasing fraud risk.

How to implement

  1. The IT team should configure the email system to check the sender's identity.

    This can be done by setting up the Sender Policy Framework (SPF) on the email server to verify the sender's details. They should ensure the server only sends failure notifications to those who pass this check.

  2. The IT manager should work with an email provider that offers sender verification features.

    This involves discussing with providers about how they validate sender identities using SPF or similar technologies, and ensuring it's included in their service package.

  3. The system administrator should regularly update the list of approved senders.

    This means reviewing and, if necessary, adding or removing email addresses or domains in the system's SPF record to align with current business needs.

  4. The office manager should educate staff on how to recognise when they should or should not receive a delivery failure notice.

    This can be done through a training session explaining that only verified senders will receive these notifications, reducing confusion and potential fraud.

  5. HR should include email usage and sender verification policies in the employee handbook.

    They should outline procedures on how employees can ensure their emails are recognised as legitimate by the systems in use, using plain language instructions.

Keep it running

Configure NDRs to only notify senders that pass SPF, DKIM/DMARC or other trusted checks; review mail gateway rules and update records regularly.

Evidence and audit

  1. Check 1 of 4What an auditor asks for

    Ask for

    The email server's SPF configuration report.

    Look at

    The records to check if the sender verification is applied correctly. Good evidence shows SPF records that match current business domains and restrict unauthorised sending.

    Good evidence

    Provides clear descriptions of their verification processes, referencing SPF or similar methods.

  2. Check 2 of 4What an auditor asks for

    Ask for

    To see the list of allowed senders in the email system.

    Look at

    Regular updates and alignment with active employees and domains.

    Good evidence

    List is current, accurately reflects business operations, and excludes inactive or unauthorised accounts.

  3. Check 3 of 4What an auditor asks for

    Look at

    Agendas and attendance lists from training sessions. Good documentation shows that employees were educated about receiving failure notifications only when the sender is verified.

  4. Check 4 of 4What an auditor asks for

    Ask for

    Copies of the relevant sections in the employee handbook on email use policies.

    Look at

    Details about sender verification and notification handling.

    Good evidence

    Handbook clearly instructs staff on these processes, updated to reflect current systems and practices.

Mappings

Closest match in ISO/IEC 27001: A.5.14, Information transfer policies and procedures, which this control partially meets.

ISO 27001

ISO/IEC 27001: 1 mapping

Mappings show how controls relate across frameworks. They do not imply full equivalence or certification.