Essential Eight PA-ML2.1 Fortnightly vulnerability scanning for non-core applications
What it says
A vulnerability scanner is used at least fortnightly to identify missing patches or updates for vulnerabilities in applications other than office productivity suites, web browsers and their extensions, email clients, PDF software, and security products.
Quoted as published. Everything else on this page is written by Control Stack.
What it means
In plain EnglishUse a vulnerability scanner every two weeks to find missing patches in non-core applications.
This control is about regularly checking less critical applications, which aren't part of the typical office suite, for security gaps or vulnerabilities every two weeks. It's important because if these applications aren't updated, hackers could exploit weaknesses in them to access sensitive information or disrupt operations, even though they're not as commonly targeted as core applications.
Free. Save your status, tasks and notes.
Why it matters
Without fortnightly scanning, unpatched non-core applications can harbour known vulnerabilities, enabling initial access, data theft, or disruption.
How to implement
The system administrator should run vulnerability scans on all non-core applications every two weeks.
Use a trusted vulnerability scanning tool to automate this process.
The IT team should ensure the vulnerability scanner's database is kept up to date.
Regularly check for database updates and apply them promptly to identify the latest threats.
The security officer should review scan results to identify missing patches or updates.
Analyse the results and prioritise patches based on the severity of vulnerabilities found.
The IT team should document the scanning process and results.
Maintain a record of scan dates, the applications scanned, and the actions taken in response to any vulnerabilities found.
Keep it running
Run vulnerability scans at least fortnightly across all non-core applications; track findings, validate coverage, and prioritise patching by severity and exposure.
Evidence and audit
- Check 1 of 2What an auditor asks for
Ask for
How often are vulnerability scans conducted on non-core applications?
Look at
Examine the vulnerability scanning schedule and logs for regular scans.
Good evidence
Evidence shows scans are conducted every two weeks, and records indicate consistent coverage of non-core applications.
- Check 2 of 2What an auditor asks for
Ask for
Is the vulnerability database updated regularly?
Look at
Check logs or records of the update history for the vulnerability scanner.
Good evidence
Logs confirm the vulnerability database is updated at least within 24 hours before each scan.
Mappings
Closest match in ASD Information Security Manual: ISM-1700, Regular vulnerability scanning for applications, which asks for the same thing.
ASD Information Security Manual: 6 mappings
This control is equivalent to ISM-1700.
E8-PA-ML2.1 requires a vulnerability scanner be used at least fortnightly to identify missing patches or updates for vulnerabilities in non-core applications (excluding office suites, browsers/extensions, email clients, PDF software, and security products). ISM-1700 states the same scanning frequency and the same application scope exclusions to find missing patches/updates. The intent, cadence, and target application set align closely, so implementing ISM-1700 would largely satisfy E8-PA-ML2.1.
This control partially meets ISM-2118.
ISM-2118 requires vulnerability assessments and penetration tests before deployment (and significant changes) and at least every six months thereafter. E8-PA-ML2.1 specifies a recurring vulnerability scanning cadence (fortnightly) for non-core applications, which is one method of vulnerability assessment that can contribute evidence for ISM-2118. ISM-2118 is broader because it also includes penetration testing and explicit pre-deployment testing requirements, not just periodic scanning for missing patches.
This control partially overlaps ISM-1693.
E8-PA-ML2.1 requires fortnightly vulnerability scanning to identify missing patches for non-core applications. ISM-1693 focuses on applying patches/updates for those same non-core applications within one month of release. They overlap because scanning output is a key input to timely patching, but E8-PA-ML2.1 is about detection cadence while ISM-1693 is about remediation timeframe.
This control partially overlaps ISM-1699.
ISM-1699 requires weekly vulnerability scanning to identify missing patches/updates for a defined set of key end-user software (productivity, browsers, email, PDF, security products). E8-PA-ML2.1 also requires vulnerability scanning for missing patches/updates, but it targets applications outside that key software set and only requires it at least fortnightly. They overlap on the practice of scanning for missing patches, but differ on software scope (core vs non-core applications) and required frequency (weekly vs fortnightly).
This control partially overlaps ISM-1703.
ISM-1703 requires a vulnerability scanner to be used at least fortnightly to identify missing driver patches or updates. E8-PA-ML2.1 requires the same type of scanning at the same frequency, but for a broad set of non-core applications. ISM-1703 and E8-PA-ML2.1 overlap on the vulnerability scanning process and cadence, while differing in asset class (drivers vs applications).
This control supports ISM-0298.
E8-PA-ML2.1 requires fortnightly vulnerability scanning to identify missing patches for non-core applications. ISM-0298 requires a centralised, managed approach to deliver patches/updates with integrity and confirmation of successful application across applications and platforms. E8-PA-ML2.1 supports ISM-0298 by generating authoritative patch gap data that can be fed into centralised patch workflows, but it does not itself manage or confirm patch deployment.
ASD Essentials for enterprise IT: 1 mapping
- IT.PRO-06.1Continuously scan and assess assets for known software and configuration weaknessesPartially overlaps
This control partially overlaps IT.PRO-06.1.
IT.PRO-06.1 requires continuous, repeatable assessment, including vulnerability scanning, to identify known weaknesses; E8-PA-ML2.1 is one case: scanning at least fortnightly for missing patches in applications other than office, browser, email, PDF and security software.
Mappings show how controls relate across frameworks. They do not imply full equivalence or certification.




